Canada in the Great War
The Great War In Their Boots Lest We Forget Behind The Scenes Directors Blog The Film Index
  Home   The Great War | The War Years | Passchendeale 
spacer spacer
Significance and Losses
The battle, technically, was a success; General Currie had completed the task set out by Haig. But many questioned the cost and the achievement. In what became known as the Third Battle of Ypres, British and Dominion casualties topped 260,000. Currie’s solemn estimate of the cost to take Passchendaele (16,000 casualties) was strangely accurate – Canadians suffered 15,654 casualties in the battle. Many soldiers and officers called the mud and carnage of Passchendaele the most brutal and horrible experience of the war. Others called it a senseless waste of life and at least one soldier called it simply “hell on earth.”

The Canadians had once again proved their tenacity and valour (many Victoria Crosses were awarded at Passchendaele for extraordinary demonstrations of personal courage). Though the original offensive had been launched to shore up the French and to attack German submarine bases in Belgian
spacer spacer
top left top right
pic
 
BOTLEFT botright
spacer
spacer
ports, by 1917 the French had largely recovered and Allied convoys had for the most part neutralized the submarine threat by introducing a convoy system and using destroyers as protective escorts. The losses of ships by submarine attack was reduced to almost zero. Most historians agree that pushing
spacer
spacer spacer
  Carrying the wounded
Almost 16,000 Canadians were wounded or killed at Passchendaele for a victory that was short-lived and without strategic value, a waste of human life on an enormous scale.
spacer
 
     1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9   num_left arrow
 
footer